Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

employee-liability exclusion

Read a random definition: parliamentary diplomacy

A quick definition of employee-liability exclusion:

An employee-liability exclusion is a rule in some insurance policies that says the insurance company won't pay for any injuries that happen to an employee while they are working for their employer. This is because the injuries are usually covered by workers' compensation laws. It's like saying the insurance won't cover something that is already taken care of by another law.

A more thorough explanation:

The employee-liability exclusion is a provision in some commercial general liability insurance policies that excludes coverage for injury to an employee (or a member of the employee's family) that occurs during the course of employment with the insured. This exclusion is generally intended to exclude from coverage all injuries covered by the workers'-compensation laws.

For example, if an employee is injured while performing their job duties, they would not be able to file a claim against the employer's liability insurance policy because the injury would be covered by workers' compensation insurance instead.

Another example would be if an employee's family member is injured while visiting the workplace, they would not be able to file a claim against the employer's liability insurance policy because the injury would be considered an employee liability and excluded from coverage.

The purpose of this exclusion is to prevent double coverage for employee injuries and to ensure that workers' compensation insurance is the primary coverage for such injuries.

employee givebacks | employee pro hac vice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:04
time to harass glove on linkedin
lilypadfrog
14:06
that’s a good way to stay awake. tell him to come back here
14:08
lily i broke a rubber band already
14:08
le sigh
lilypadfrog
14:08
damn you get vicious with it. just pinch yourself or something
lilypadfrog
14:09
don’t break your finger
14:13
its a bum-ass law school but LSD really needs to update UCLawSF's name
14:13
whose manager can I call about that
lilypadfrog
14:14
I think the people in charge don’t come on here anymore but you can email them if you really care like that
14:14
yeah true that. Although I prefer Hastings just because it is easy to differentiate from U of SF
renard99
14:14
There's a lot on this site that doesn't work and for maybe $5k I'd be more than willing to fix it
14:14
send bid proposal Renard
renard99
14:14
But as Lilypad said it's probably just maintained atp, no major updates
14:15
fwiw all the UCLSF students I know still basically say hastings. even the huge crest in the foyer still says hastings
renard99
14:15
@llama: Man I'd be more than happy to
14:15
LSD is in decay age of social network
renard99
14:15
^LMAO yeah
renard99
14:15
Basically accepted atp that I'm gonna have to R&R so might as well take up some jobs while I'm at it
14:15
sad. imagine being here in 2005/2010 when it was 100 operational. woe is me
@llama: back when 160s meant t14
14:16
born too late to experience full LSD born too soon to explore the galaxy
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.