Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

employment-at-will doctrine

Read a random definition: brother

A quick definition of employment-at-will doctrine:

The employment-at-will doctrine means that an employer or employee can end their work relationship at any time, without needing a specific reason. However, there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, an employer cannot fire an employee for reporting a work injury or for refusing to break the law. Additionally, if an employer has made promises or created expectations of job security, they may not be able to fire an employee without cause. Some states also recognize a duty of good faith and fair dealing, which means that employers cannot fire employees out of malice or bad faith.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Employment-at-will is an agreement between an employer and employee that states that the employment is for an indefinite period and can be terminated by either party at any time. This agreement is usually included in the employment contract.

Exceptions: Even if the employment agreement is at-will, there are certain reasons why termination could still be wrongful. These exceptions vary by state.

  • Public Policy Exception: Employers cannot terminate employees in violation of well-established public policy of the state. For example, an employee cannot be terminated for filing a workers' compensation claim after an on-the-job injury.
  • Implied Contract Exception: An employee may have an expectation of a fixed term or indefinite employment based on something the supervisor has done. This can take the form of employer's statements, an employer’s practice of only firing employees for cause, or an assertion in the employee handbook that specific termination procedures will be followed.
  • Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing: Some states recognize an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in employment relationships. Under this exception, an employer typically may not terminate an employee in bad faith or terminate an employee when the termination is motivated by malice.

Example: An employee in California is terminated after refusing to participate in illegal activities at the request of their employer. This termination would be wrongful under the public policy exception, as the employee cannot be terminated for refusing to violate the law at the employer's request.

Explanation: This example illustrates the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Even though the employment agreement may be at-will, the employer cannot terminate the employee for refusing to participate in illegal activities. This is because it violates the well-established public policy of the state.

employment discrimination | en banc

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.