Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

entry, right of

Read a random definition: delegator

A quick definition of entry, right of:

Entry, right of is a legal term that refers to a situation where a person who has sold a property retains the right to take it back if the buyer fails to meet certain conditions. This is called a power of termination. For example, if a person sells a house to someone else but includes a condition that the buyer must keep the house in good condition, the seller can take the house back if the buyer fails to do so. This right is also known as a right of entry, right of reentry, or right of entry for breach of condition. It is important to note that this right only applies if the seller exercises it, and it is different from a possibility of reverting, which is an automatic right of the seller to take back the property if certain conditions are not met.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Entry, right of refers to a future interest that a grantor retains after conveying a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. This means that the grantee's estate will only terminate if the grantor exercises the right to retake it, which happens upon breach of the condition. It is also known as right of entry, right of reentry, right of entry for breach of condition, or right of entry for condition broken.

Examples: If a landowner grants a lease to a tenant for a period of 10 years, subject to the condition that the tenant must not use the property for commercial purposes, the landowner retains the right of entry. If the tenant violates the condition by using the property for commercial purposes, the landowner can exercise the right of entry and terminate the lease.

Another example is when a homeowner sells their property to a buyer, subject to the condition that the buyer must not make any structural changes to the house. If the buyer violates the condition by adding a new room to the house, the homeowner retains the right of entry and can retake the property.

These examples illustrate how the right of entry works in practice. The grantor retains the power to terminate the grantee's estate if the condition is breached, but only if they exercise the right of entry.

entrusting | entry, writ of

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.