Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

equitable right to setoff

Read a random definition: praedial tithe

A quick definition of equitable right to setoff:

An equitable right to setoff is when a bank can take money from a customer's account to pay off debts that the customer owes to the bank. It's like if you owe your friend money and they take it out of the allowance you owe them. A covenant is a promise or agreement, usually in a contract or deed. It can be a promise to do something or not do something. For example, if you promise to keep your yard clean, that's a covenant. If you promise not to sell your house to someone, that's also a covenant. Some covenants are binding on future owners of the property, while others are only between the original parties.

A more thorough explanation:

The equitable right to setoff is a legal term that refers to the right of a bank to cancel cross-demands. This is usually done by taking the amount owed by a customer from their deposit accounts. For example, if a customer owes the bank $100 and has $50 in their account, the bank can use the equitable right to setoff to take the $50 and apply it towards the customer's debt.

One example of the equitable right to setoff is when a customer has a loan with a bank and also has a deposit account with the same bank. If the loan becomes due and the customer has not paid it, the bank can use the funds in the deposit account to pay off the loan.

Another example is when a customer has multiple accounts with a bank, such as a checking account and a savings account. If the customer owes the bank money and has funds in both accounts, the bank can use the equitable right to setoff to take the funds from one account to pay off the debt in the other account.

equitable right | equitable subrogation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.