Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

European Court of Human Rights

Read a random definition: statute roll

A quick definition of European Court of Human Rights:

European Court of Human Rights: The European Court of Human Rights is a group of judges who work together to make sure that people's basic rights are protected. They were created in 1959 and have 41 judges who are chosen by the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly. The court helps to make sure that people's rights are not violated and that they are treated fairly.

A more thorough explanation:

The European Court of Human Rights is a judicial body of the Council of Europe. It was established in 1959 and underwent significant changes between 1994 and 1998. The court consists of 41 judges, each elected by the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly. Its main function is to adjudicate alleged violations of civil and political rights as outlined in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

If a citizen of a member state of the Council of Europe feels that their human rights have been violated, they can bring a case to the European Court of Human Rights. For example, if a person is arrested and detained without a fair trial, they can file a complaint with the court. The court will then investigate the case and make a ruling on whether or not the person's rights were violated.

This example illustrates how the European Court of Human Rights serves as a means of protecting the rights of citizens in member states of the Council of Europe. It ensures that governments are held accountable for any violations of human rights and provides a mechanism for citizens to seek justice.

European Copyright Directive | European Currency Unit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.