Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ex post facto law

Read a random definition: here and there

A quick definition of ex post facto law:

An ex post facto law is a law that is applied retroactively, meaning it affects actions that were legal when they were committed. This type of law is not allowed in criminal cases according to the U.S. Constitution. However, it may be allowed in civil cases. A retroactive law is a legislative act that looks back at the past and affects acts or facts that existed before the law came into effect. It is only unconstitutional if it impairs the obligation of contracts, divests vested rights, or is constitutionally forbidden.

A more thorough explanation:

An ex post facto law is a law that retroactively applies to an action that was legal when it was committed, especially if it negatively affects a person's rights. For example, if a law is passed today that makes it illegal to drive a red car, and someone who drove a red car yesterday is punished for it, that would be an ex post facto law.

Ex post facto criminal laws are prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, but retrospective civil laws may be allowed. A retrospective law is a legislative act that looks backward or contemplates the past, affecting acts or facts that existed before the act came into effect. A retroactive law is not unconstitutional unless it (1) is in the nature of an ex post facto law or a bill of attainder, (2) impairs the obligation of contracts, (3) divests vested rights, or (4) is constitutionally forbidden.

For example, if a law is passed that changes the tax rate for the previous year, that would be a retrospective law, but it would not be an ex post facto law because it does not criminalize an action that was legal when it was committed.

Ex Post Facto Clause | exposure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
starfishies
16:25
@Mostlylegal: yep i got 4/1 i applied early dec (it was my last app) and @Jupiter i really have an overall positive view of the school if you ever need positive confirmation for them
Mostlylegal
16:32
lets hope friday is our day, i just got mine tday
16:35
can i ask an lsat question rq?
Mostlylegal
16:37
sure
starfishies
16:38
yep hoping for some straggling decisions before the 4/15 deposit deadline but ill be alright if not
any guesses on the next wave for loyola chicago?
Looks like no waves td
captaincringe
18:16
Just got a WL email from Loyola Chicago a few mins ago. Good luck!
MrThickRopes
18:42
fo pm gon come thru 4 us tmrw
starfishies
18:43
absolutely
HumdrumSoreGecko
18:52
Any SMU waves soon? App status updated but nothing yet :)
19:15
2.9/17high splitter best shot?
19:15
2.9/17high splitter best shot?
MrThickRopes
19:35
bro got a 2.9 bro is NOT the thinker
starfishies
19:37
thats not nice
19:39
im dead😂
19:40
MrThickRopes
starfishies
19:40
washu would want u ;-;
19:41
Thank u!
[] c0bra1
20:40
is nyu doing tuesdays instead of wednesdays now
MrThickRopes
23:12
fuuuckkkk
MrThickRopes
23:12
mr thick. ropes is . wasteddddd
Just wnna say im proud of everyone who applied to schools this year! You’re amazing!!
Hi guys quick question
Has anyone applied to Jacksonville ?
Jacobdoeshisbest
1:24
Hi
whats up yall i have noone to tell that I just got a 169 on a practice test and I am so proud of myself. that's all
@DirtyQuackYak: Congrats but that's not good enough. 173 is the new 170 so do the math. Buckle up.
@CheerfulSpikyVole: Nah, no one would apply to that school that hangs around here.
@MrThickRopes: sounds like the next Dkk.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.