Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ex post facto law

Read a random definition: enclosure (inclosure)

A quick definition of ex post facto law:

An ex post facto law is a law that is applied retroactively, meaning it affects actions that were legal when they were committed. This type of law is not allowed in criminal cases according to the U.S. Constitution. However, it may be allowed in civil cases. A retroactive law is a legislative act that looks back at the past and affects acts or facts that existed before the law came into effect. It is only unconstitutional if it impairs the obligation of contracts, divests vested rights, or is constitutionally forbidden.

A more thorough explanation:

An ex post facto law is a law that retroactively applies to an action that was legal when it was committed, especially if it negatively affects a person's rights. For example, if a law is passed today that makes it illegal to drive a red car, and someone who drove a red car yesterday is punished for it, that would be an ex post facto law.

Ex post facto criminal laws are prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, but retrospective civil laws may be allowed. A retrospective law is a legislative act that looks backward or contemplates the past, affecting acts or facts that existed before the act came into effect. A retroactive law is not unconstitutional unless it (1) is in the nature of an ex post facto law or a bill of attainder, (2) impairs the obligation of contracts, (3) divests vested rights, or (4) is constitutionally forbidden.

For example, if a law is passed that changes the tax rate for the previous year, that would be a retrospective law, but it would not be an ex post facto law because it does not criminalize an action that was legal when it was committed.

Ex Post Facto Clause | exposure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.