Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

exculpatory-no doctrine

Read a random definition: CEQ

A quick definition of exculpatory-no doctrine:

The exculpatory-no doctrine is a rule in criminal law that says a person cannot be punished for lying about their guilt when questioned by an investigator. This is because of the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided that this rule does not apply in federal law.

A more thorough explanation:

The exculpatory-no doctrine is a principle in criminal law that states a person cannot be charged with making a false statement for falsely denying guilt in response to an investigator's question. This doctrine is based on the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

For example, if a police officer asks a suspect if they committed a crime and the suspect denies it, they cannot be charged with making a false statement. This is because the suspect has the right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves.

However, the U.S. Supreme Court has overruled this doctrine in federal law. In the case of Brogan v. United States, the court ruled that a person can be charged with making a false statement even if they were denying guilt in response to an investigator's question.

exculpate | ex curia

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 10 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
nope cornell can be 2.
cornell is incredibly based
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
texaslawhopefully
17:03
"Two recent polls found opposition to pardoning the J6ers at 57 and 59 percent, respectively, and that was before Americans understood that even the cop-beaters in the crowd that day would be let off scot-free."
I wonder if this chat has mods
17:04
as most dictators who have come into power do, he appealed to the masses just to turn face once in power
Barely nutty
Dkk
17:04
@texas maybe so. Maybe so.
17:04
we have been duped.
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.