Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

executive privilege

Read a random definition: trusteeship

A quick definition of executive privilege:

Executive privilege is a power that the President and other officials in the executive branch have to keep certain private conversations secret from the courts and Congress. This power is based on the idea that the government's power is divided into different branches, and each branch has its own responsibilities. However, this power is not absolute, and courts can decide whether or not to allow it depending on the situation. For example, if the information is important for a criminal case, the President may have to provide it. Overall, executive privilege is a way for the government to balance the need for transparency with the need for confidentiality.

A more thorough explanation:

Executive privilege is a power that the President and other officials in the executive branch have to keep certain confidential communication from the courts and the legislative branch. This means that they can choose not to share certain information if they believe it is necessary to protect the interests of the government.

For example, if the President is having a private conversation with one of his advisors about a sensitive national security issue, he may choose to keep that conversation private and not share it with Congress or the courts. This is because he believes that sharing that information could harm national security.

However, the courts have the power to weigh the applicability of executive privilege by balancing competing interests. This means that if someone is suing the government and needs access to certain information to make their case, the court may require the government to share that information, even if it is normally protected by executive privilege.

One famous example of this was the Watergate scandal, where President Nixon was required to turn over recordings of private conversations he had with his aides. This helped to establish how executive privilege should be defined in judicial settings.

Overall, executive privilege is an important power that allows the government to keep certain information private in order to protect the interests of the country. However, it is not an absolute power, and the courts have the ability to weigh its applicability on a case-by-case basis.

executive power | executor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.