Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

executory remainder

Read a random definition: pit and gallows

A quick definition of executory remainder:

Executory remainder: This is another term for a contingent remainder, which means that the person who is supposed to receive the property after the current owner dies is not yet known. It is called "executory" because it is dependent on a future event happening, such as the death of the current owner or the occurrence of a specific condition. Until that event happens, the person who will receive the property is uncertain.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An executory remainder is a type of future interest in property that is created in a third party and takes effect only if a specific condition is met. It is similar to a contingent remainder, but differs in that it does not require the termination of a prior estate to become possessory.

Example: John conveys his property to his son, Tom, for life, with the remainder to Tom's children. However, if Tom dies without any children, the property will go to John's daughter, Sarah. In this scenario, Sarah has an executory remainder because her interest in the property is contingent upon the condition that Tom dies without any children.

Explanation: The example illustrates how an executory remainder is created in a third party and takes effect only if a specific condition is met. In this case, Sarah's interest in the property is contingent upon the condition that Tom dies without any children. If Tom has children, then Sarah's interest in the property will not take effect. Therefore, an executory remainder is a type of future interest that is subject to a condition precedent.

executory interest | executrix

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.