Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

expert

Read a random definition: frivolous defense

A quick definition of expert:

An expert is someone who knows a lot about a certain topic because they have studied it or have a lot of experience with it. They can give their opinion to help people understand something better. Before an expert can share their opinion in court, a judge has to make sure that what they say is based on good science or knowledge. This is called the Daubert test. The judge wants to make sure that the expert's opinion is helpful and reliable.

A more thorough explanation:

An expert is a person who has gained knowledge or skills in a particular subject through education or experience. They can provide an opinion that helps the fact-finder in a legal case.

For example, in a medical malpractice case, a doctor who specializes in the same field as the defendant doctor may be called as an expert witness to provide an opinion on whether the defendant doctor acted negligently. The expert's opinion can help the jury understand complex medical issues and make an informed decision.

However, not all expert testimony is admissible in court. The Daubert test is used to determine whether expert testimony is relevant and reliable. The test considers factors such as whether the theory has been tested, peer-reviewed, and accepted by the relevant scientific community.

Overall, an expert is someone who has specialized knowledge or skills in a particular subject and can provide valuable insight in a legal case.

experimental-use exception | expert-reliance materials

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:36
I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to
1a2b3c4d26z
11:37
but that's literally just going off vibes
it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video
"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment
1a2b3c4d26z
11:38
One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences
getting lunch no one say anything funny or do anything cool for 15 mins
triplethread
11:43
my dick fell off
Trump dropped out of the race
TheMidwestMonger
11:46
Any chance Notre Dame releases earlier this year?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.