Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

expert witness

Read a random definition: desecrate

A quick definition of expert witness:

An expert witness is someone who knows a lot about a specific topic and can help a judge or jury understand it better. They can give their opinion on things that regular people might not know much about. There are two types of witnesses in court: regular people who saw or heard something happen (called lay witnesses) and experts. Experts have to be really good at what they do and have proof to back up their opinions. They can help in different kinds of court cases, like when someone needs to figure out what happened with a computer or how a bullet went through the air. Before they go to court, experts have to write down what they think and share it with everyone else. This helps everyone understand what they will say in court.

A more thorough explanation:

An expert witness is someone who has a lot of knowledge and experience in a specific field. They are called to give their professional opinion in court or to a tribunal about a particular matter that is in dispute. There are two types of witnesses in the US legal system: lay witnesses and expert witnesses. A lay witness can only talk about what they saw or heard, but an expert witness can give their opinion based on their expertise.

For example, a digital forensics expert can help in a court case by analyzing deleted computer files, consulting on how to preserve or retrieve data, and determining how a computer was used. They can explain digital subject matter so that non-experts can understand. In a shooting case, people who saw or heard the shooting may have relevant information to testify how many shots were fired, but only an expert who has qualifications would be allowed to answer questions about the path of the bullet.

Before trial, all experts must prepare a report summarizing their analysis and conclusions, and share the report with all other parties. This allows other parties to effectively cross-examine the expert. Expert testimony is not limited to matters beyond the understanding of the ordinary juror. Instead, experts may testify on any subject within their area of expertise so long as their testimony will assist the jury.

Overall, an expert witness is an important part of the legal system because they can provide specialized knowledge and help the court make informed decisions.

expert testimony | Export Control Classification Number (ECCN)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.