Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

express contract

Read a random definition: shared parenting

A quick definition of express contract:

An express contract is a type of agreement where people promise to do something for each other and they say exactly what they will do either by talking or writing it down. To make an express contract, both people have to agree to the same thing and they have to give something in return. This is different from a contract that is not written down, where people just act like they made a promise without actually saying it.

A more thorough explanation:

An express contract is a type of agreement between two or more parties where the terms of the contract are clearly stated either verbally or in writing. This means that the parties involved have agreed to be bound by the terms of the contract that have been explicitly stated.

For an express contract to be valid, it must include:

An express contract is different from a contract-implied-in-fact. A contract-implied-in-fact is an agreement where the obligations arise from a mutual agreement and intent to promise, but the agreement and promise have not been expressed in words. In other words, the terms of the contract are not explicitly stated.

Both types of contracts require mutual assent and a meeting of the minds. However, an express contract is proved by an actual agreement (either written or oral), while a contract-implied-in-fact is proved by circumstances and the conduct of the parties.

Here are some examples of express contracts:

  • A written contract between a landlord and a tenant that clearly states the terms of the lease agreement, such as the rent amount, the length of the lease, and the security deposit.
  • An oral agreement between a homeowner and a contractor to remodel a kitchen, where the contractor clearly states the scope of work, the timeline, and the cost of the project.

These examples illustrate the definition of an express contract because in both cases, the terms of the agreement are clearly stated either in writing or verbally. The parties involved have agreed to be bound by the terms of the contract that have been explicitly stated.

express authority | express notice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.