Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

facially sufficient

Read a random definition: label license

A quick definition of facially sufficient:

Facially sufficient means that a document looks valid on the surface. For example, a search warrant may look like it was properly obtained, but if it was based on lies from the police officer who wrote it, it can still be challenged in court. If there is evidence that the document was not truthful, a hearing called a Franks hearing can be held to determine if the evidence obtained from the search warrant can be used in court.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Facially sufficient refers to a document that appears to be valid on its face.

For example, a search warrant affidavit may be considered facially sufficient if it meets all the legal requirements and appears to be valid. However, if the affidavit is based on false testimony by the officer making the affidavit, it can still be challenged and attacked.

In such cases, a Franks hearing may be held to determine whether the affidavit used to obtain a search warrant was based on false statements by the police officer. This hearing is named after the Franks v. Delaware case, which established the right to challenge the validity of a search warrant affidavit.

Overall, facially sufficient means that a document appears to be valid and meets all the legal requirements on its face, but it can still be challenged if there is evidence of false statements or other legal issues.

facial challenge | facially void

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.