Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Falconer error

Read a random definition: New Rules

A quick definition of Falconer error:

Term: Falconer Error

Definition: When a judge forgets to tell the jury that if they find someone guilty of manslaughter, they must acquit them of murder. This mistake is called a Falconer error, named after a court case where it happened.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Falconer error is a mistake made by a trial court when it fails to instruct the jury that if they find the defendant guilty of manslaughter, they must acquit the defendant of murder charges. This error is named after the case Falconer v. Lane, which was decided by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1990.

Example: Imagine a case where a defendant is charged with both murder and manslaughter. The jury finds the defendant guilty of manslaughter but does not acquit the defendant of murder. This is a Falconer error because the jury was not properly instructed that a guilty verdict on the manslaughter charge requires an acquittal on the murder charge.

Explanation: In the example given, the Falconer error occurred because the jury was not properly instructed on the law. The law requires that if a defendant is found guilty of a lesser offense, such as manslaughter, they cannot also be found guilty of a greater offense, such as murder. This is because the elements of the lesser offense are included in the greater offense. Therefore, if the defendant is guilty of the lesser offense, they must be acquitted of the greater offense. The Falconer error occurs when the jury is not properly instructed on this principle of law.

Falcidian portion | faldage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.