Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

trial court

Read a random definition: common nuisance

A quick definition of trial court:

A trial court is where a case is heard for the first time. This court decides what happened in the case and what the law says about it. If someone disagrees with the decision, they can ask a higher court to review it. Trial courts can hear many different types of cases, but some courts only hear certain kinds of cases.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Trial courts are courts that hear a case for the first time. They are also known as courts of original jurisdiction. A trial court makes decisions based on both facts and laws presented during a full trial. The decisions made by a trial court can be appealed to a higher court for review. In contrast, an appellate court only reviews the decisions made by the trial court and is limited to certain issues.

Both the federal and state governments have designated trial courts. A trial court of general jurisdiction can hear any civil or criminal case that is not already exclusively within the jurisdiction of another court. Examples of trial courts of general jurisdiction include the United States district courts on the federal level and state-level trial courts such as the New York Supreme Courts and the California Superior Courts. A trial court of limited jurisdiction can only hear specific kinds of cases based on subject matter, amount in controversy, statutory grant, or administrative matters.

Examples:

  • A person is charged with a crime and their case is heard in a trial court. The trial court hears evidence from both the prosecution and defense and makes a decision based on the facts and laws presented.
  • A couple is getting a divorce and their case is heard in a trial court. The trial court hears evidence from both parties and makes a decision on how to divide their assets and determine child custody.

These examples illustrate how trial courts are responsible for hearing cases for the first time and making decisions based on the evidence presented. The decisions made by the trial court can be appealed to a higher court for review.

Trial | trial de novo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.