Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fault divorce

Read a random definition: legal force

A quick definition of fault divorce:

Fault divorce is when one spouse proves that the other spouse did something that caused the marriage to fail. This can include things like cheating, being mean, going to jail, being unable to have sex, or being very sick. Even though most states now allow couples to get divorced without blaming anyone, some states still let couples get divorced because of fault. Sometimes, fault can also affect how things like money and children are divided between the two people getting divorced.

A more thorough explanation:

Fault divorce

Fault divorce is when one spouse proves that the other spouse did something that caused the marriage to fail. Each state has different reasons for fault divorce, but some common ones are adultery, cruelty, being in prison, physical inability to have sex, and incurable insanity. Although all states allow no-fault divorce, about two-thirds of them still allow couples to get a divorce based on fault grounds. In some states, fault can also affect how property is divided, how much alimony is awarded, and who gets custody of the children.

Example 1: John and Jane have been married for 10 years. John has been cheating on Jane for the past year, and Jane has proof of his infidelity. Jane can file for a fault divorce based on adultery.

Example 2: Sarah and Tom have been married for 5 years. Tom has been physically abusive towards Sarah, and she has documented evidence of his abuse. Sarah can file for a fault divorce based on cruelty.

These examples illustrate how one spouse can prove that the other spouse did something that caused the marriage to fail. In both cases, the spouses have evidence to support their claims, which can be used in court to obtain a fault divorce.

FAQ | FCBA

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.