Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fighting words

Read a random definition: consumer loan

A quick definition of fighting words:

Fighting words are words that are meant to start a fight or violence. These words are not protected by the First Amendment, which is a law that protects free speech in the United States. The Supreme Court has defined fighting words as words that can hurt someone or make them want to fight right away. However, not all words that cause a disturbance or disagreement are considered fighting words. The First Amendment still protects speech, even if it is considered fighting words, as long as it is not discriminating against a certain viewpoint.

A more thorough explanation:

Fighting words are words that are intended to provoke violence and may not be protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court defined fighting words in the case of Chaplinsky v New Hampshire (1942) as words that "by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."

Examples of fighting words include racial slurs, insults, and threats of violence. For instance, if someone were to use a racial slur against another person with the intention of provoking a physical altercation, those words could be considered fighting words.

However, not all offensive speech is considered fighting words. In the case of Texas v. Johnson (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag, while offensive to some, was not considered fighting words because it did not directly provoke violence.

It is important to note that even if speech is considered fighting words, it may still be protected under the First Amendment if the restriction on speech is based on viewpoint discrimination. This means that the government cannot punish speech simply because they disagree with the ideas expressed.

Fifth Amendment | file

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.