Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fixed in a tangible medium of expression

Read a random definition: execution creditor

A quick definition of fixed in a tangible medium of expression:

Fixed in a tangible medium of expression: This means that in order for something to be protected by copyright, it must be put into a physical form that others can see or hear. It can't just be an idea in someone's head. For example, a book or a song is fixed in a tangible medium of expression because it exists in a physical form that others can read or listen to. This is important because copyright exists to prevent others from copying someone else's work, and if the work is not fixed in a tangible medium of expression, it can't be copied.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: "Fixed in a tangible medium of expression" is a requirement for a work to receive copyright protection under the Copyright Act in 17 U.S.C. § 102(a). This means that a work must be expressed in a way that others can see or hear it, and it must be put into a physical form that is accessible by others.

For example, a book is fixed in a tangible medium of expression because it is written down and can be read by others. A film is also fixed in a tangible medium of expression because it is recorded and can be watched by others.

The purpose of this requirement is to prevent ideas themselves from being copyrighted, as copyright exists to protect the expression of ideas rather than the ideas themselves. It also ensures that the work can be communicated to others and referenced in the future.

However, new technologies such as artificial intelligence are posing new challenges to this requirement, as it may be difficult to determine if a work created by AI is fixed in a tangible medium of expression.

fixed asset | fixed rate mortgage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.