Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

forum inconveniens

Read a random definition: district

A quick definition of forum inconveniens:

Forum Inconveniens: A legal term that means an unsuitable court. It is a doctrine in civil procedure that allows a court to divest itself of jurisdiction if it appears that the action should proceed in another forum for the convenience of the litigants and witnesses. This means that even if a court is competent under the law, it may dismiss a case if it is more convenient for the case to be heard in another court where the case could have been properly brought in the first place. This doctrine is also known as forum non conveniens.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Forum Inconveniens is a legal doctrine that allows a court to dismiss a case if it appears that another forum would be more convenient for the parties and witnesses involved, even if the court has jurisdiction over the case.

For example, if a person files a lawsuit in a court that is far away from where the incident occurred and where the witnesses and evidence are located, the court may dismiss the case based on forum inconveniens. The court may determine that it would be more convenient for the case to be heard in a different court that is closer to the incident and witnesses.

This doctrine is used to prevent oppression or vexation that may result from automatically honoring the plaintiff's choice of forum. However, it is important to note that the alternative forum must have jurisdiction over all parties involved and be able to provide complete relief.

forum externum | forum internum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:36
I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to
1a2b3c4d26z
11:37
but that's literally just going off vibes
it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video
"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment
1a2b3c4d26z
11:38
One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences
getting lunch no one say anything funny or do anything cool for 15 mins
triplethread
11:43
my dick fell off
Trump dropped out of the race
TheMidwestMonger
11:46
Any chance Notre Dame releases earlier this year?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.