Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

forward agreement

Read a random definition: trustee, U.S.

A quick definition of forward agreement:

A forward agreement is a type of contract between two or more parties that creates obligations that can be enforced by law. It is a written document that sets out the terms of the agreement. A contract can refer to three things: the actions taken by the parties to create the agreement, the physical document that records the agreement, and the legal obligations that result from the agreement. A contract is essentially a promise or set of promises that the law recognizes as a duty, and if the promises are broken, the law provides a remedy.

A more thorough explanation:

A forward agreement is a type of contract between two or more parties that creates enforceable obligations. It is also known as a forward contract.

For example, let's say that a farmer wants to sell their crop to a buyer at a future date. They could enter into a forward agreement that specifies the price, quantity, and delivery date of the crop. This creates a legal obligation for both parties to fulfill their end of the agreement.

Another example could be a company that wants to hedge against fluctuations in currency exchange rates. They could enter into a forward agreement with a bank to exchange a set amount of one currency for another at a future date and at a predetermined exchange rate.

These examples illustrate how a forward agreement creates a legally binding obligation for both parties to fulfill their end of the contract. It provides certainty and reduces risk for both parties involved.

for use | forward and backward at sea

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
12:08
I was looking into adding a URM boost, bit ig the LUI, Law Underrepresented Index, is a secret lmao
urm boost is so variable
texaslawhopefully
12:09
So what exactly does the index number mean
depends on which type of urm you are plus how the schools feel about urm that given cycle
12:10
lol so are the constant index values -169.98 to 267.167 variance
12:10
range*
12:11
also, idk who needs to hear this but working with 2+ monitors is suck a game changer
12:16
i love my 2 monitors at work
12:16
such* fuck my fat fingers
12:17
if i was Tex I wouldn’t worry about index numbers. they’re just LSAT and GPA reformulated into an index. you’re above them. end of story
texaslawhopefully
12:17
Yeah, that’s fair. And clearly being above them is meaningless
texaslawhopefully
12:18
I just want Chicago to accept me at this point. I feel like it’s such a good fit, my whole narrative is free expression and whatnot
12:20
the index seems applicable for splitters or low score ppl.
12:20
to assess their value to each school
12:20
Index numbers seem useful mostly to help you see how soon your app might be reviewed after submitting, since admissions officers are incentivized to make decisions on high performers early. But I’m not actually sure how useful that is in reality lol. It could also give some hints on how much a school weighs gpa vs lsat
12:20
yeah tldr mathy astrology for admissions lmfao
12:21
but but but correlation within the data set always is causation. -155 scorer be like
12:22
I definitely made a copy of that sheet out of curiosity. I love how it’s formatted
12:24
does the status "File under review" or "Review In Progress" count as UR?
12:24
I’d count both of those as UR
12:24
ok tyyy
There is a guy an admitted students group chat plugging his book and offering to send signed copies, like fuck bro this is not the place and I now know who I want to avoid
12:50
she split on my median
JumpySubsequentDolphin
12:55
omg bunny
JumpySubsequentDolphin
12:55
did you end up liking the curve love jeans from Abercrombie
killjoyace
13:12
@llama: i think the user index (column R) formula for columbia is wrong (mistyped probably) but other than that this is a spectacular spreadsheet
killjoyace
13:13
SORRY stanford
killjoyace
13:13
not columbia
13:28
@killjoyace: yep u were 100% correct thankya
killjoyace
13:30
no problem!! really really great work with the spreadsheet btw it's amazing
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.