Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fraudulent-concealment rule

Read a random definition: jacens

A quick definition of fraudulent-concealment rule:

The fraudulent-concealment rule is a principle that says if someone does something to stop another person from finding out about a legal claim, the time limit for filing that claim is paused until the person discovers or should have discovered the claim. This rule is also called the concealment rule.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The fraudulent-concealment rule, also known as the concealment rule, is a legal principle that states a defendant's actions that prevent a plaintiff from discovering the existence of a claim can toll the statute of limitations until the plaintiff discovers or should have discovered the claim.

For example, if a doctor intentionally conceals a medical error from a patient, and the patient only discovers the error after the statute of limitations has expired, the fraudulent-concealment rule may apply. The patient may be able to bring a claim against the doctor because the statute of limitations was tolled until the patient discovered the error.

Another example could be a company that intentionally hides information from investors about the true financial state of the company. If the investors only discover the truth after the statute of limitations has expired, the fraudulent-concealment rule may apply, and the investors may be able to bring a claim against the company.

These examples illustrate how the fraudulent-concealment rule can protect plaintiffs from being unfairly barred from bringing a claim due to a defendant's intentional actions to conceal information.

fraudulent claim | fraudulent conversion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.