Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

full faith and credit

Read a random definition: subject of a right

A quick definition of full faith and credit:

Full faith and credit is a rule that says courts in one state must respect the laws and decisions made by courts in other states. This helps prevent conflicts between states and makes sure that court decisions are reliable across the country. It stops people from going to another state to try and change a decision they didn't like. This rule also applies to certain laws, like marriage. However, sometimes a court can ignore a decision from another state if the original court didn't have the power to make that decision or didn't follow the right rules.

A more thorough explanation:

Full faith and credit is a requirement in the United States Constitution that says state courts must respect the laws and judgments of courts from other states. This means that if a court in one state makes a decision on a legal issue, courts in other states must follow that decision if the same issue comes up in their state.

For example, if a court in California decides that a person is not guilty of a crime, and that person moves to New York and is charged with the same crime, the court in New York must respect the decision made in California and also find the person not guilty.

The full faith and credit clause is important because it helps prevent conflicts between states and ensures that legal decisions are consistent across the country. It also prevents people from going to different states to try to get a different outcome in their legal cases.

However, there are some situations where a court may not have to follow the decision of another court. For example, if the court that made the original decision did not have the authority to do so, or if the decision violates the Constitution.

One example of how the full faith and credit clause works is with marriage. If a couple gets married in one state, other states must recognize that marriage as valid. This means that if the couple moves to a different state, they are still considered married and have the same legal rights as they did in the state where they got married.

full disclosure | functionality doctrine (trademark)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.