Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

full-reporting clause

Read a random definition: gross spread

A quick definition of full-reporting clause:

A full-reporting clause is a rule in an insurance policy that requires the person being insured to tell the truth about the value of what they are insuring. If they don't tell the truth, they can be punished. The clause also says that the amount of money the insurance company will pay out will be based on the value that was last reported, compared to the actual value.

A more thorough explanation:

A full-reporting clause is a term used in insurance policies that requires the insured to disclose all relevant information about the insured property or item. This clause penalizes the insured if they fail to reveal the actual value of the property or item in the policy application. It is also known as an honesty clause.

For example, if a homeowner fails to disclose that their house has a swimming pool, and the pool is damaged in a storm, the insurance company may refuse to pay for the damages because the homeowner did not disclose the pool's existence in the policy application.

Another example is when a business owner insures their inventory but fails to disclose the actual value of the inventory. If there is a fire, and the inventory is destroyed, the insurance company may only pay a portion of the claim because the insured did not report the actual value of the inventory.

The full-reporting clause is designed to ensure that the insurance company has accurate information about the insured property or item, which helps them determine the appropriate premium and coverage amount. It also protects the insurance company from fraud and misrepresentation by the insured.

full proof | full right

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.