Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

GATT

Read a random definition: aniente

A quick definition of GATT:

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is an agreement between many countries to reduce barriers to trade. It started in 1947 with 23 countries and grew to over 100 by 1973. GATT successfully lowered tariffs, quotas, and other barriers to trade among member countries. Before GATT, many countries had high tariffs, which made it hard to trade with other countries. GATT helped rebuild economies after World War II by making it easier to trade. GATT became its own organization for managing trade issues among members. The WTO replaced GATT and is now the forum for enforcing and changing provisions of the GATT. GATT requires member states to apply tariffs in a non-discriminate way and limits the ability of countries to place higher restrictions on goods from other member states than within their own country. Other major sources of friction for international trade such as quotas, dumping, and subsidies are very limited under GATT, reducing the ability of countries to be singled out by another country.

A more thorough explanation:

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is an agreement between many countries to reduce barriers to trade. It was created after World War II to help rebuild economies and counterbalance the harmful effects of high tariffs. GATT successfully reduced average tariffs among member countries from over 20% to around 5% or less.

For example, before GATT, many countries had tariffs of over 40% during the 1930s. But with GATT, member states agreed to apply tariffs in a non-discriminate way, meaning they should apply to all member states equally with limited exceptions. GATT also limited the ability of countries to place higher restrictions on goods from other member states than within their own country. This helped to reduce friction for international trade and allowed for more beneficial global trade among member states.

While GATT was meant as a multilateral treaty, it effectively became its own organization for managing trade issues among members due to the failed International Trade Organization (ITO). After many more rounds of negotiations, GATT evolved into the World Trade Organization (WTO), which became the new forum for enforcing and changing provisions of the GATT.

Overall, GATT was an important agreement that helped to reduce barriers to trade and promote economic growth among member states.

garnishment | gender bias

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.