Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

gender bias

Read a random definition: enterceur

A quick definition of gender bias:

Gender bias is when someone is treated differently because of their gender. This means that a person might be treated unfairly because they are a boy or a girl, or because they identify as a different gender. In some situations, like when deciding who should take care of a child, it is against the law to consider someone's gender. It is also not okay for a judge to be biased or mean to someone because of their gender.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Gender bias is when someone is treated differently based on their gender identity, whether it is real or perceived.

For example, if a teacher gives better grades to male students than female students, that is an example of gender bias. Another example is if a company only hires men for certain positions and women for others, that is also gender bias.

In California, the law says that a court cannot consider a person's gender identity or expression when deciding child custody. This means that a judge cannot give custody to a parent just because they are a man or a woman.

Under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, it is illegal to discriminate against someone based on their gender in any education program or activity that receives federal funding. This means that schools cannot treat male and female students differently or give them different opportunities just because of their gender.

It is also important to note that judges cannot be biased based on gender. They cannot treat someone unfairly or harass them because of their gender.

GATT | gender identity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.