Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Graham v. Florida (2010)

Read a random definition: canon emphyteuticus

A quick definition of Graham v. Florida (2010):

Graham v. Florida (2010) was a case in the United States Supreme Court. The case was about whether a young person who committed a crime that was not murder could be sentenced to life in prison without the chance of getting out. The person who brought the case, Terrance Graham, was on probation for a crime he committed when he was 16. When he was 17, he and two other people robbed a house and hurt someone. Graham was caught and sentenced to life in prison without the chance of getting out. The Supreme Court decided that this was not fair because young people are not as mature as adults and should not be punished so harshly for non-murder crimes. The Court said that Graham's sentence was too harsh and sent the case back to the lower court to decide what to do next.

A more thorough explanation:

Graham v. Florida (2010) is a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court had to decide if it was okay to sentence a minor to life in prison without the possibility of parole for a non-homicide crime.

For example, in this case, Terrance Graham was on probation for crimes he committed when he was 16. When he was 17, he and two other people committed a home invasion robbery. One of the people was shot, and Graham left him at the hospital and tried to run away from the police. He was caught and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole.

Graham argued that this sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, which is not allowed by the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court agreed with him. They said that sentencing a minor to life in prison for a non-homicide crime was not fair. Juveniles are not as mature as adults and may not understand the consequences of their actions. The Court said that this kind of sentence did not help the offender become a better person.

So, the Court reversed Graham's sentence and sent the case back to the lower court for more proceedings.

grace period | Graham v. Richardson

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.