Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Graham v. Florida (2010)

Read a random definition: utlagare

A quick definition of Graham v. Florida (2010):

Graham v. Florida (2010) was a case in the United States Supreme Court. The case was about whether a young person who committed a crime that was not murder could be sentenced to life in prison without the chance of getting out. The person who brought the case, Terrance Graham, was on probation for a crime he committed when he was 16. When he was 17, he and two other people robbed a house and hurt someone. Graham was caught and sentenced to life in prison without the chance of getting out. The Supreme Court decided that this was not fair because young people are not as mature as adults and should not be punished so harshly for non-murder crimes. The Court said that Graham's sentence was too harsh and sent the case back to the lower court to decide what to do next.

A more thorough explanation:

Graham v. Florida (2010) is a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court had to decide if it was okay to sentence a minor to life in prison without the possibility of parole for a non-homicide crime.

For example, in this case, Terrance Graham was on probation for crimes he committed when he was 16. When he was 17, he and two other people committed a home invasion robbery. One of the people was shot, and Graham left him at the hospital and tried to run away from the police. He was caught and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole.

Graham argued that this sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, which is not allowed by the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court agreed with him. They said that sentencing a minor to life in prison for a non-homicide crime was not fair. Juveniles are not as mature as adults and may not understand the consequences of their actions. The Court said that this kind of sentence did not help the offender become a better person.

So, the Court reversed Graham's sentence and sent the case back to the lower court for more proceedings.

grace period | Graham v. Richardson

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.