Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

gross estate

Read a random definition: doctrine of election

A quick definition of gross estate:

Term: Gross estate

Definition: Gross estate is all the valuable things a person owns when they die. This includes things like houses, money, stocks, jewelry, and debts owed to them. To figure out how much tax the estate owes, the gross estate is calculated by adding up the value of everything. This is important because the more valuable the estate, the more tax that needs to be paid. It's different from probate estate, which is just the property that needs to go through a legal process after someone dies.

A more thorough explanation:

Gross estate refers to all of the assets owned by a person at the time of their death. It is used to calculate whether an estate is subject to federal and state estate taxes and how much. Gross estate includes all valuable property such as real estate, cash, stocks, life insurance, jewelry, furniture, and owed debts.

  • A person owns a house worth $500,000, has $100,000 in a savings account, and $50,000 in stocks. They also have a life insurance policy worth $1 million. When this person dies, their gross estate would be $1.65 million.
  • Another person owns a small business worth $200,000, has $20,000 in a checking account, and a car worth $10,000. When this person dies, their gross estate would be $230,000.

These examples illustrate how gross estate includes all valuable property owned by a person at the time of their death. It is important to calculate the gross estate in order to determine if the estate is subject to estate taxes and how much.

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) | gross income

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.