Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Grundy Tariff

Read a random definition: direct skip

A quick definition of Grundy Tariff:

The Grundy Tariff, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, was a law passed in 1930 that increased taxes on goods imported into the United States. This made it more expensive for other countries to sell their products in the US, and caused those countries to raise their own taxes on American goods. This led to a decrease in international trade and is believed to have contributed to the Great Depression, a time of economic hardship in the US and around the world.

A more thorough explanation:

The Grundy Tariff, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, was a protectionist law passed in 1930 that increased tariff rates on most imported goods in the United States. This led to other countries implementing similar tariff increases, which contributed to the Great Depression.

The Act was named after its sponsors, Senator Reed Smoot of Utah and Representative Willis C. Hawley of Oregon. However, it is sometimes referred to as the Grundy Tariff because Joseph Grundy, the president of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association, was the main lobbyist supporting the Act.

For example, if a foreign company wanted to sell their products in the United States, they would have to pay a higher tariff than before the Grundy Tariff was passed. This made it more expensive for them to do business in the U.S., which led to retaliatory tariffs from other countries. As a result, international trade decreased, and the global economy suffered.

grundnorm | GRUT

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.