Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

guilty plea

Read a random definition: decemviri litibus judicandis

A quick definition of guilty plea:

A guilty plea is when someone admits in court that they did something wrong. It's like saying "yes, I did it." This usually happens as part of a deal with the prosecutor. It's important that the person understands what they're doing and that they're doing it on their own. Once they plead guilty, it's like they've been found guilty after a trial.

A more thorough explanation:

A guilty plea is a formal admission made by an accused person in court that they committed the charged offense. It is one of the three possible responses to a criminal charge, the other two being "not guilty" and "no contest."

For example, if someone is charged with theft and they admit in court that they stole the item, they are entering a guilty plea.

A guilty plea is usually part of a plea bargain, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a reduced sentence or other concessions from the prosecutor. However, the plea must be made voluntarily and only after the accused has been informed of and understands their rights.

If a defendant enters a guilty plea, it has the same effect as a guilty verdict and conviction after a trial on the merits. This means that the defendant will be sentenced for the crime they admitted to committing.

Other types of pleas include:

  • Not guilty plea: An accused person's formal denial in court of having committed the charged offense.
  • No contest plea: A plea by which the defendant does not contest or admit guilt.
  • Conditional plea: A plea of guilty or no contest entered with the court's approval and the government's consent, the defendant reserving the right to appeal any adverse determinations on one or more pretrial motions.

guilty mind | guilty verdict

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.