Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

habentes homines

Read a random definition: peremptory writ of mandate

A quick definition of habentes homines:

Term: HABENTES HOMINES

Definition: Habentes homines is a Latin term used in history and law to refer to rich men. It means "men who have" and is also known as foesting-men.

A more thorough explanation:

HABENTES HOMINES

habentes homines (hə-ben-teez hom-ə-neez), n. [Law Latin “men who have”] refers to rich men.

For example, in medieval times, the nobility and wealthy merchants were considered habentes homines because they had the means to acquire and maintain wealth and power.

This term is also known as foesting-men.

The term habentes homines is a Latin phrase that translates to "men who have." In legal contexts, it refers to wealthy individuals who have the means to acquire and maintain wealth and power. The term was commonly used in medieval times to describe the nobility and wealthy merchants who held significant influence in society. The term is still used today in legal and historical contexts to describe individuals who possess significant wealth and power.

habendum et tenendum | habere

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.