Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)

Read a random definition: program committee

A quick definition of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004):

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) was a case in the United States Supreme Court. The case was about a man named Hamdi who was an American citizen and was put into confinement at Guantanamo Bay by the government. The Court ruled that even people who are detained as enemy combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a neutral decision maker. This means that even in times of war, citizens have the right to know why they are being held and have a fair chance to prove that they should not be held.

A more thorough explanation:

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, is a U.S. Supreme Court case that established the constitutional right of people detained as enemy combatants to challenge their detention before a neutral decision maker.

For example, in the case, an American citizen named Hamdi was designated as an "enemy combatant" by the government and placed into indefinite confinement at Guantanamo Bay. The Court of Appeals ruled against Hamdi, but the Supreme Court reversed the judgment and held that even citizens declared as "enemy combatant" have due process rights.

This means that even in times of war, the country must uphold its values and the privileges of citizenship. Citizens declared as "enemy combatant" have the right to know the factual basis for their classification and to have a fair opportunity to challenge the government's assertions before a neutral decision maker.

This case is important because it established that even in times of war, the government must respect the constitutional rights of its citizens and provide them with due process. It also highlights the importance of having a neutral decision maker to ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

half blood | harass

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
But maybe not lmao
@texaslawhopefully: aw im sorry to hear tht. i also rsn out of messages AGAIN AND I JUST GOT HERE...im asking cuz i cant find something on the app tht i thought maybe one of yall knew.
@ImpartialLion: yeah, that does sound good. I'm sure will get a II soon
mine was very generic and we have similar numbers
babycat
16:02
I like that Chicago specifically says don't recite shit from our website
I'm hoping so. I feel like my PS might've been too personal or too whiney. I feel like it either hits or totally whiffs depending on who reads it
UVA loved it, but HLS and Chicago don't seem to love it as much
hey UVA hates me, so the process is fairly random
babycat
16:04
end of cycle everyone posts their PS
It's so random.
babycat
16:04
it's like flashing
@babycat: FRRR
Create a google folder and throw that shit in
I will probably add a link to all my materials end of cycle
I never thought about it but I think I will too
16:05
GULC would be about 5:30 right
JumpySubsequentDolphin
16:08
if washu admissions emails me one more time i might delete my lsac account
Dkk
16:08
Lol, the Cornell waitlist wave. Get fucked.
Dkk
16:08
That fucking sucks.
snow
16:08
lowkey im going to be optimistic. i just saw that some people applied early sept. and got II for schools in January
@JumpySubsequentDolphin: I've been tempted to put them in spam
snow
16:08
lmaooo dk
dk praying on all our downfall
Dkk
16:09
I hope you guys tell me to eat a dick when I get my R's and WL's.
praying for your success inshallah
Dkk
16:10
I want it to be brutal.
Dkk
16:10
Noooooo
JumpySubsequentDolphin
16:10
@texaslawhopefully: THEY SEND THEM TO YOU EVEN AFTER YOU GOT ACCEPTED???
I've been getting them literally every other day for months now
JumpySubsequentDolphin
16:11
that’s absurd
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.