Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hands-off agreement

Read a random definition: Self-serving

A quick definition of hands-off agreement:

A hands-off agreement is a rule that an employer and a former employee agree to follow. It says that the employee cannot use what they learned while working for the employer to take away customers or business from the employer.

A more thorough explanation:

A hands-off agreement is a type of contract between an employer and a former employee. This agreement prevents the employee from using any information they learned during their employment to take customers away from their former employer.

For example, let's say that John works for a software company. He has access to all of the company's customer information, including their contact details and purchasing history. If John were to leave the company and start his own software business, he could use this information to try and steal customers away from his former employer. However, if John signed a hands-off agreement, he would be legally bound to not use this information to compete with his former employer.

Another example could be a salesperson who leaves their job at a car dealership. If they signed a hands-off agreement, they would not be able to use any customer information they obtained while working at the dealership to try and sell cars to those customers at a different dealership.

Overall, a hands-off agreement is a way for employers to protect their business interests and prevent former employees from using confidential information to compete with them.

handsale | hand up

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.