Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hold harmless

Read a random definition: substance

A quick definition of hold harmless:

Hold harmless means that one party promises not to blame or sue the other party if something goes wrong. For example, if you rent a store and the landlord promises to keep it safe, but you get hurt because the landlord didn't fix something, you might agree not to sue the landlord if they promise to pay for your medical bills. This promise is called a hold harmless clause. It's not allowed in most homes, but it might be okay in stores or offices.

A more thorough explanation:

Hold harmless is a legal promise made in a contract. It means that one party agrees not to hold the other party responsible if something goes wrong. For example, if you rent an apartment, the lease might include a hold harmless clause. This means that you promise not to sue the landlord if you get hurt because of something the landlord did or didn't do.

Hold harmless clauses are usually not allowed in residential leases, but they can be used in commercial leases. For instance, a business owner might agree not to sue the landlord if a customer gets hurt on the property.

Here's an example: A company hires a contractor to build a new office building. The contract includes a hold harmless clause. This means that if the contractor accidentally damages something while building the office, the company won't sue the contractor for the cost of the damage.

The examples illustrate how hold harmless clauses work. They protect one party from being sued by the other party if something goes wrong. This can be helpful in situations where accidents are more likely to happen, like construction sites or commercial properties.

hobby loss | holder

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.