Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

holder in due course

Read a random definition: simony

A quick definition of holder in due course:

A holder in due course is someone who receives a special kind of paper called a negotiable instrument, like a check or promissory note, in exchange for something valuable, like money. They have no reason to think that the paper is bad or has already been rejected. If they are a holder in due course, they have the right to get paid by the person who made the paper.

A more thorough explanation:

A holder in due course is a person who receives or holds a negotiable instrument, such as a check or promissory note, in good faith and in exchange for value. This means that the holder received the instrument without any knowledge that it was overdue or had been previously dishonored. As a result, the holder is entitled to payment by the creator of the instrument.

  • John sells his car to Jane and accepts a promissory note as payment. Jane later sells the promissory note to Mark for its full value. Mark is a holder in due course because he received the note in good faith and for value, without any knowledge that it was overdue or had been dishonored.
  • Tom writes a check to his landlord for rent. The landlord deposits the check, but it bounces due to insufficient funds in Tom's account. The landlord then sells the check to a collection agency. The collection agency is not a holder in due course because they received the check after it had been dishonored.

The examples illustrate that a holder in due course is someone who receives a negotiable instrument in good faith and for value, without any knowledge of its dishonor or overdue status. This person is entitled to payment by the creator of the instrument, even if there are issues with the payment such as insufficient funds in the account.

holder | holding

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.