Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

horizontal restraint

Read a random definition: lawburrows

A quick definition of horizontal restraint:

A horizontal restraint is when businesses at the same level of distribution make an agreement to limit competition, create a monopoly, or raise prices. This is usually illegal, but can be considered reasonable if it benefits both parties and the public. It is called "horizontal" because it involves competitors at the same level.

A more thorough explanation:

A horizontal restraint is a type of restraint of trade that is imposed by an agreement between competitors at the same level of distribution. This means that businesses at the same level, such as two retailers or two manufacturers, agree to limit competition between them.

For example, two gas stations in the same town might agree to keep their prices at the same level, even if one of them could charge more. This would be a horizontal restraint because it is an agreement between two businesses at the same level of distribution.

Horizontal restraints are usually illegal because they limit competition and can lead to higher prices for consumers. However, they may be considered reasonable if they are in the best interests of both parties and the public.

It is important to note that a horizontal restraint is different from a vertical restraint, which is an agreement between firms at different levels of distribution, such as a manufacturer and a retailer.

Overall, horizontal restraints are a type of antitrust violation that can harm competition and consumers.

horizontal-property act | horizontal union

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.