Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hostile amendment

Read a random definition: SLC

A quick definition of hostile amendment:

A hostile amendment is a proposed change to a law or rule that is made with the intention of causing harm or opposition. It is a type of amendment that is not made in good faith and is meant to disrupt or sabotage the original proposal. An amendment is a formal revision or addition to a document, and can be made by adding, deleting, or correcting wording. There are different types of amendments, such as those made by a committee or from the floor, and some may be considered friendly if they are supported by the original proposer and not objected to by others. However, a hostile amendment is the opposite of a friendly amendment and is made with negative intentions.

A more thorough explanation:

A hostile amendment is a proposed change to a law or document that is intended to harm or undermine the original purpose or intent. It is called "hostile" because it is not made in good faith and is meant to sabotage the original proposal.

For example, if a bill is proposed to increase funding for public schools, a hostile amendment might be proposed to remove all funding for public schools instead. This amendment is not made to improve the bill, but to defeat it.

Another example of a hostile amendment is when a member of a group proposes a change to a proposal that they do not support, in order to make it less appealing to others and decrease its chances of passing.

These examples illustrate how a hostile amendment is a manipulative tactic used to undermine the original proposal and is not made in good faith.

hostile act | hostile bidder

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.