Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hypothetical monopolist test

Read a random definition: assecurator

A quick definition of hypothetical monopolist test:

The hypothetical monopolist test is a way to determine if a company has too much power in a certain market. To do this, we ask if a pretend company that has a monopoly on the product could raise the price a little bit and still make money. If the answer is yes, then the market is defined correctly. If the answer is no, then we need to include other products in the market to get a better understanding of the situation. This helps us figure out if the company is breaking any laws by having too much control over the market.

A more thorough explanation:

The hypothetical monopolist test is a method used to determine if a product market is properly defined before it can be determined whether a company has monopoly power in that market or has violated antitrust law. This test is used in the Horizontal Merger Guidelines.

The test asks whether a hypothetical monopolist can profitably impose a small but significant and non-transitory increase in price in the product market as defined. If the answer is yes, and the price increase would be profitable for the hypothetical monopolist, then the market is correctly defined. If the answer is no, then the relevant product market is defined too narrowly and must be expanded to include other goods and services.

For example, let's say there are two companies that produce soda: Company A and Company B. The hypothetical monopolist test would ask whether Company A could profitably impose a small but significant and non-transitory increase in price for soda. If the answer is yes, then the relevant product market is defined as soda. If the answer is no, then the relevant product market may need to be expanded to include other beverages, such as juice or water.

The hypothetical monopolist test is important because it helps to ensure that antitrust laws are being enforced properly. If a company has too much market power, it can harm competition and consumers by raising prices and reducing choices. By using the hypothetical monopolist test, regulators can determine whether a company has too much market power and take action to protect competition and consumers.

hypothecate | I am a lawyer who has a client complaining about spam email. What should I be worried about?

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
10:56
@soap: really hoping to get that UTK call today
11:08
what if instead of a room of one’s own virgina Woolf wrote a cubicle of one’s own
UGA ED deferrals are coming out rn
Only 14 days left until HLS sends out their first wave of decisions. I'm thinking about re-using my advent calendar to help me count down
alcohol advent calendar for decisions sounds incredible
@Unrepentant-Caucasian: ur bio is crazy
11:41
@chickenburgahfart: cauc is the zezemzer with a plan
@chickenburgahfart: Thanks, I guess? lol
Wow... Luigi Mangione just pled Not Guilty. He has to be banking on a jury nullification play, right? Honestly voir dire will be the most impactful part of the trial by far, I can't imagine the defense can present any credible exculpatory evidence.
12:00
I think he just wants it to go to trial
12:00
make a show of it
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:02
they're charging him with terrorism, was he ever going to get a plea deal that was even remotely worth taking?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:03
Dude wants to be famous and seen as a martyr this is his chance
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:03
i think they want to roll the dice
I can understand that, but that's exactly why I would offer him a halfway decent plea deal as the DA. Maybe offer 25 years at medium security, as opposed to being guaranteed to die at ADX Florence.
snow
12:06
its a state case, right?
snow
12:06
not federal?
Oh yeah, my bad
snow
12:07
you're good, i was just making sure. yeah, i would take it to trial
snow
12:07
you just need one juror
snow
12:07
but i think that if i were the state, i would not be scared to bust the jury if i had to
I mean, you only need one juror to get a hung jury and a retrial, you need all 12 to get found innocent
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
I do not see him doing a long time, if he is not punished hard then more (less attractive) crazy people will come out and start murdering for social justice and expect the same
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
*him not doing a long time
snow
12:08
need to see what all he is charged with tbh
snow
12:09
and the possibility for parole in new york
snow
12:09
in texas murder is a 3g offense and he would have to do have that time before parole eligibility. idk how new york works
snow
12:11
half
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:11
Too public of a case, they have to go hard on the dude and in a couple years when people forget I am sure he can apply and get a lesser sentence or possibility of parole added. Dude needs to blame all the self medication he did
snow
12:13
that works in his favor that the case is public, at least this case. thats why i think the state shouldnt be scared to bust the jury if they really want to get him
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.