Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Idaho

Read a random definition: ex ship

A quick definition of Idaho:

Idaho: A state in the United States that has laws to protect people from unwanted emails and phone calls. The Idaho Unfair Bulk Electronic Mail Practices Act makes it illegal to send spam emails, and people can sue if they receive them. The Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act sets rules for telemarketing calls, and the Idaho Consumer Protection Act of 1971 protects people from unfair business practices.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Idaho has several laws in place to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive business practices. These laws cover areas such as commercial email and spam, telemarketing and telephonic anti-solicitation, and unlawful trade practices.

The Idaho Unfair Bulk Electronic Mail Practices Act, codified at Idaho Code Title 48, Chapter 6 (§ 48-603E), is an amendment to the Idaho Consumer Protection Act of 1971. This law specifically enables the exercise of a private right of action under that Act. This means that individuals can take legal action against businesses that engage in unfair or deceptive practices related to bulk electronic mail, also known as spam.

If a business sends unsolicited emails to consumers in Idaho, and those emails contain false or misleading information, the business could be in violation of the Idaho Unfair Bulk Electronic Mail Practices Act. For example, if a business sends an email claiming that the recipient has won a prize, but the prize does not actually exist, this would be considered a deceptive practice.

The Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act, codified at Idaho Code Title 48, Chapter 10 (§§ 48-1001 - 48-1010), sets out specific requirements for businesses that engage in telemarketing or other forms of telephonic solicitation. This law is designed to protect consumers from unwanted and potentially deceptive phone calls.

If a business calls a consumer in Idaho and tries to sell them a product or service, they must comply with the requirements set out in the Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act. For example, they must identify themselves and the purpose of the call, and they must provide the consumer with a way to opt out of future calls.

The Idaho Consumer Protection Act of 1971, codified at Idaho Code Title 48, Chapter 6 (§§ 48-601 - 48-619), is a broad law that covers a wide range of unfair and deceptive business practices. This law is designed to protect consumers from businesses that engage in fraudulent or deceptive practices.

If a business in Idaho makes false or misleading claims about their products or services, they could be in violation of the Idaho Consumer Protection Act. For example, if a business claims that their product can cure a specific medical condition, but they have no scientific evidence to support this claim, they could be engaging in deceptive practices.

I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza | IEP

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
so congratulations on pre xmas waves
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
10:27
Hope schools are chill and just send As leaving the Rs for next month lol
soap
10:49
Fingers crossed for good luck today
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
10:56
@soap: really hoping to get that UTK call today
11:08
what if instead of a room of one’s own virgina Woolf wrote a cubicle of one’s own
UGA ED deferrals are coming out rn
Only 14 days left until HLS sends out their first wave of decisions. I'm thinking about re-using my advent calendar to help me count down
alcohol advent calendar for decisions sounds incredible
@Unrepentant-Caucasian: ur bio is crazy
11:41
@chickenburgahfart: cauc is the zezemzer with a plan
@chickenburgahfart: Thanks, I guess? lol
Wow... Luigi Mangione just pled Not Guilty. He has to be banking on a jury nullification play, right? Honestly voir dire will be the most impactful part of the trial by far, I can't imagine the defense can present any credible exculpatory evidence.
12:00
I think he just wants it to go to trial
12:00
make a show of it
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:02
they're charging him with terrorism, was he ever going to get a plea deal that was even remotely worth taking?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:03
Dude wants to be famous and seen as a martyr this is his chance
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:03
i think they want to roll the dice
I can understand that, but that's exactly why I would offer him a halfway decent plea deal as the DA. Maybe offer 25 years at medium security, as opposed to being guaranteed to die at ADX Florence.
snow
12:06
its a state case, right?
snow
12:06
not federal?
Oh yeah, my bad
snow
12:07
you're good, i was just making sure. yeah, i would take it to trial
snow
12:07
you just need one juror
snow
12:07
but i think that if i were the state, i would not be scared to bust the jury if i had to
I mean, you only need one juror to get a hung jury and a retrial, you need all 12 to get found innocent
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
I do not see him doing a long time, if he is not punished hard then more (less attractive) crazy people will come out and start murdering for social justice and expect the same
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
*him not doing a long time
snow
12:08
need to see what all he is charged with tbh
snow
12:09
and the possibility for parole in new york
snow
12:09
in texas murder is a 3g offense and he would have to do have that time before parole eligibility. idk how new york works
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.