Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Idaho

Read a random definition: base-point pricing

A quick definition of Idaho:

Idaho: A state in the United States that has laws to protect people from unwanted emails and phone calls. The Idaho Unfair Bulk Electronic Mail Practices Act makes it illegal to send spam emails, and people can sue if they receive them. The Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act sets rules for telemarketing calls, and the Idaho Consumer Protection Act of 1971 protects people from unfair business practices.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Idaho has several laws in place to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive business practices. These laws cover areas such as commercial email and spam, telemarketing and telephonic anti-solicitation, and unlawful trade practices.

The Idaho Unfair Bulk Electronic Mail Practices Act, codified at Idaho Code Title 48, Chapter 6 (§ 48-603E), is an amendment to the Idaho Consumer Protection Act of 1971. This law specifically enables the exercise of a private right of action under that Act. This means that individuals can take legal action against businesses that engage in unfair or deceptive practices related to bulk electronic mail, also known as spam.

If a business sends unsolicited emails to consumers in Idaho, and those emails contain false or misleading information, the business could be in violation of the Idaho Unfair Bulk Electronic Mail Practices Act. For example, if a business sends an email claiming that the recipient has won a prize, but the prize does not actually exist, this would be considered a deceptive practice.

The Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act, codified at Idaho Code Title 48, Chapter 10 (§§ 48-1001 - 48-1010), sets out specific requirements for businesses that engage in telemarketing or other forms of telephonic solicitation. This law is designed to protect consumers from unwanted and potentially deceptive phone calls.

If a business calls a consumer in Idaho and tries to sell them a product or service, they must comply with the requirements set out in the Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act. For example, they must identify themselves and the purpose of the call, and they must provide the consumer with a way to opt out of future calls.

The Idaho Consumer Protection Act of 1971, codified at Idaho Code Title 48, Chapter 6 (§§ 48-601 - 48-619), is a broad law that covers a wide range of unfair and deceptive business practices. This law is designed to protect consumers from businesses that engage in fraudulent or deceptive practices.

If a business in Idaho makes false or misleading claims about their products or services, they could be in violation of the Idaho Consumer Protection Act. For example, if a business claims that their product can cure a specific medical condition, but they have no scientific evidence to support this claim, they could be engaging in deceptive practices.

I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza | IEP

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.