Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

identifying material

Read a random definition: approved list

A quick definition of identifying material:

Identifying material refers to a part or representation of a whole work that is submitted to the U.S. Copyright Office. When someone wants to register their copyright, they must submit at least one complete copy of their work, which can be in the form of drawings, photocopies, or selected pages of computer software programs and databases. If the work contains a trade secret or is difficult to deposit, a substitution is allowed.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Identifying material is a portion or representation of a complete work that is deposited with the U.S. Copyright Office. This is done to protect the copyright of the work.

A copyright registrant is required to deposit at least one complete copy of the work, and often two. However, if a trade secret would be revealed by the deposit or if the work's nature makes deposit difficult, a substitution is acceptable. Common forms of identifying material are drawings, photocopies, and selected pages of computer-software programs and databases.

Examples:

  • A photographer may deposit a few selected photographs from their portfolio as identifying material for their copyright registration.
  • An author may deposit the first few chapters of their book as identifying material.
  • A software company may deposit selected pages of their software program as identifying material.

These examples illustrate how identifying material is a portion or representation of a complete work that is deposited with the U.S. Copyright Office. It is used to protect the copyright of the work and can be in the form of drawings, photocopies, or selected pages of computer-software programs and databases.

identify | identikit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.