Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

identity of parties

Read a random definition: perpars

A quick definition of identity of parties:

Identity of Parties: When two parties are so closely related that a judgment against one of them prevents any further legal action against the other, it is called the identity of parties. This means that if one party is held responsible for something, the other party cannot be held responsible for the same thing later on.

Ademption: Ademption is a legal term used in wills and estates. It means that a gift or legacy left in a will may not be given to the intended recipient if the property or asset that was supposed to be given is no longer available at the time of the testator's death. There are two theories of ademption: the identity theory and the intent theory. Under the identity theory, if the specific property is not part of the estate at the time of the testator's death, the gift fails. Under the intent theory, the recipient may still receive a gift of equal value if it can be proven that the testator did not intend for the gift to be adeemed. Ademption can occur by extinction, where the property is no longer in existence, or by satisfaction, where the testator has already given the property to the beneficiary while alive.

A more thorough explanation:

Identity of parties refers to a relationship between two parties that is so close that a judgment against one party prevents any further legal action against the other party. This is because of res judicata, which means that the matter has already been decided and cannot be brought up again.

For example, if two people are involved in a car accident and one is found to be at fault, the other party cannot sue the same person again for the same accident.

Ademption is a legal term used in wills and estates. It refers to the destruction or extinction of a testamentary gift because the asset that was bequeathed is no longer part of the estate at the time of the testator's death. There are two theories of ademption:

  • Identity theory of ademption: A specific devise of property will fail if that property is not part of the testator's estate upon their death.
  • Intent theory of ademption: When a specific devise is no longer in the testator's estate at the time of their death, the devisee will receive a gift of equal value if it can be proved that the testator did not intend the gift to be adeemed.

For example, if a testator leaves a specific piece of property to their child in their will, but they sell that property before they die, the child will not receive the property. However, if the testator had intended for the child to receive something of equal value, the child may still receive a gift.

identity of interests | ideo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.