Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

illegitimate child

Read a random definition: discretionary review

A quick definition of illegitimate child:

An illegitimate child is a child who was not born to parents who were married to each other. In the past, this meant that the child had no legal rights and could not inherit from their parents. However, now most states allow illegitimate children to inherit from their mothers and sometimes from their fathers if paternity is proven. The term "illegitimate" is not used as much anymore because it can be hurtful to children and families.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An illegitimate child is a child who was not conceived or born in lawful wedlock, nor later legitimated.

At common law, such a child was considered the child of nobody and had no name except one that was gained by reputation. Being no one's child, an illegitimate child could not inherit, even from the mother, but all states now allow maternal inheritance. Full paternal inheritance is permitted if the child can prove paternity in accordance with state law. This burden of proof, uniquely imposed on an illegitimate child, is constitutionally permissible.

Example: A child born to unmarried parents is considered an illegitimate child. In the past, illegitimate children were not entitled to the same legal rights as legitimate children, but now most states have eliminated this distinction.

Explanation: The example illustrates that an illegitimate child is a child born to unmarried parents. It also shows that in the past, illegitimate children were not treated equally under the law, but now most states have eliminated this distinction and granted them the same legal rights as legitimate children.

illegitimate | ill fame

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.