Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

immediate breach

Read a random definition: not proven

A quick definition of immediate breach:

An immediate breach is when someone breaks a promise they made in a contract. This can happen if they don't do what they said they would, say they won't do it, or interfere with someone else doing it. When this happens, the person who was supposed to get something from the contract can sue for damages. There are different types of breaches, like a material breach which is a big enough problem that the person can stop doing what they promised and sue for damages, or a partial breach which is a smaller problem that still allows the person to sue for damages but they still have to keep doing what they promised.

A more thorough explanation:

Immediate breach refers to a violation of a contractual obligation by failing to perform one's own promise, by repudiating it, or by interfering with another party's performance. This breach entitles the non-breaching party to sue for damages immediately.

For example, if a company hires a contractor to build a house and the contractor fails to complete the work on time or does not follow the agreed-upon specifications, it is an immediate breach. The company can sue the contractor for damages immediately.

Another example is when a tenant fails to pay rent on time. This is an immediate breach of the lease agreement, and the landlord can take legal action to recover the unpaid rent.

In summary, immediate breach is a serious violation of a contract that allows the non-breaching party to take legal action immediately to recover damages.

immediate annuity | immediate cause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:31
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
Eggan
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:32
^^^^ truuuuuu
Eggan
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
Eggan
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:32
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
Eggan
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
vvv hungry
Eggan
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
Eggan
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:36
CTB is it i think
Eggan
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
Eggan
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
23:02
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
23:02
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.