Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

impanel

Read a random definition: face of policy

A quick definition of impanel:

Impanel: When a group of people are chosen to decide a case, it is called impaneling. This group is called a jury. The process of impaneling includes randomly selecting potential jurors, allowing them to state reasons why they cannot serve, and giving the defense and prosecution the chance to dismiss some of them. Once the final group is chosen, they are sworn in to serve as jurors.

A more thorough explanation:

Impanel

To impanel means to choose and assign a group of people called a jury to decide a case. It is also known as empanel. The process of impaneling may include:

  • Collecting the names of potential jurors randomly
  • Selecting the individuals who will serve on the jury
  • Allowing potential jurors to state reasons why they should not serve on the jury
  • Allowing the defense and prosecution to dismiss potential jurors
  • Swearing in the jurors and alternate jurors

During a trial, the judge will impanel a jury to hear the evidence and decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. The process of impaneling involves selecting a group of people who are unbiased and able to make a fair decision based on the evidence presented in court.

For example, in a high-profile murder case, the judge may need to impanel a larger jury pool to ensure that there are enough potential jurors to choose from. The judge will then select the individuals who will serve on the jury and dismiss any potential jurors who may have a conflict of interest or bias.

Another example is during the O.J. Simpson trial, the process of impaneling a jury took several weeks due to the high-profile nature of the case. The judge had to ensure that the selected jurors were not influenced by media coverage and could make an impartial decision based on the evidence presented in court.

These examples illustrate how impaneling is an important part of the legal process to ensure that a fair and impartial jury is selected to decide a case.

impairs an exemption | impaneling

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
just tell them you're applying to monsters university
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.