Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

impaneling

Read a random definition: Federal Reporter Third Series

A quick definition of impaneling:

Impaneling is the process of choosing a group of people called a jury to decide a court case. First, names of potential jurors are randomly collected. Then, the individuals who will serve on the jury are selected. People who don't want to serve on the jury can explain why. The defense and prosecution can also dismiss potential jurors. Finally, the chosen jurors and alternate jurors are sworn in.

A more thorough explanation:

Impaneling

Impaneling, also known as empaneling, is the process of selecting and assigning a group of people called a jury to decide a case. The steps of impaneling may include:

  • Collecting the names of potential jurors randomly
  • Selecting the individuals who will serve on the jury
  • Allowing potential jurors to state reasons why they should not serve on the jury
  • Allowing the defense and prosecution to dismiss potential jurors using challenges
  • Swearing in the jurors and alternate jurors

When a person is accused of a crime and goes to trial, a jury is impaneled to hear the evidence and decide whether the person is guilty or not guilty. For example, in a murder trial, the court may randomly select a group of people from the community to serve on the jury. The defense and prosecution may then ask questions to determine if any of the potential jurors have biases or conflicts of interest that would prevent them from being fair and impartial. Once the final group of jurors is selected, they are sworn in and the trial begins.

Another example of impaneling a jury is in a civil case, such as a personal injury lawsuit. In this type of case, a group of people is selected to hear the evidence and decide whether the defendant is liable for the plaintiff's injuries. The process of impaneling a jury is similar to that of a criminal trial, with potential jurors being questioned by the attorneys and dismissed if they have biases or conflicts of interest.

These examples illustrate how impaneling is an important part of the legal system, as it ensures that a fair and impartial group of people is selected to decide the outcome of a case.

impanel | impeach

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.