Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

implied actual knowledge

Read a random definition: alien friend

A quick definition of implied actual knowledge:

Implied actual knowledge is when someone should have known something based on the information available to them, even if they didn't have direct knowledge of it. For example, if someone sees a wet floor and doesn't put up a warning sign, they have implied actual knowledge that someone could slip and get hurt. This is different from constructive knowledge, which is when someone should have known something based on reasonable care or diligence, and imputed knowledge, which is when someone is responsible for another person's actions.

A more thorough explanation:

Implied actual knowledge is a legal term that refers to knowledge that a person should have had based on the circumstances, even if they did not have direct knowledge of it. It is different from constructive knowledge, which is knowledge that a person would have had if they had exercised reasonable care or diligence.

For example, if a company's CEO is aware of a problem with a product, but does not tell anyone else in the company, the other employees may still be held responsible for the problem if they should have known about it based on their position in the company. This is because they had implied actual knowledge of the problem.

Another example is if a person sees a wet floor in a store, but does not put up a warning sign. If someone slips and falls on the wet floor, the person who saw the floor may be held responsible because they had implied actual knowledge of the danger.

implied acquittal | implied admission

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.