Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

implied-in-law contract

Read a random definition: enablement by deposit

A quick definition of implied-in-law contract:

An implied-in-law contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates obligations that are enforceable by law. It can be a verbal or written agreement, or even an agreement that is implied by the actions of the parties involved. This type of contract is also known as a quasi-contract or constructive contract. It is called "implied-in-law" because it is not explicitly stated, but rather inferred by the court based on the circumstances of the situation. Essentially, it is a legal obligation that is imposed on one party to prevent unjust enrichment or unfairness to the other party.

A more thorough explanation:

An implied-in-law contract is a type of contract that is not explicitly agreed upon by the parties involved, but is instead imposed by law to prevent one party from being unjustly enriched at the expense of another party. This type of contract is also known as a quasi-contract or constructive contract.

For example, if a contractor performs work on a property without a written contract, but the property owner accepts and benefits from the work, the law may imply a contract between the two parties. The contractor can then seek payment for the work performed, even though there was no explicit agreement.

Another example is when a person receives medical treatment in an emergency situation and is unable to consent to the treatment. The law may imply a contract between the patient and the healthcare provider, allowing the provider to seek payment for the services rendered.

Overall, an implied-in-law contract is a legal concept that allows for the enforcement of obligations and duties between parties, even when there is no explicit agreement in place.

implied-in-law condition | implied intent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.