Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

implied license by legal estoppel

Read a random definition: master in chancery

A quick definition of implied license by legal estoppel:

An implied license by legal estoppel is a permission given to someone to do something that would normally be illegal, based on the actions or words of the person who owns the property. This permission cannot be taken away later, even if the owner changes their mind. It is like giving someone a key to your house and then trying to kick them out later - you can't do it because you already gave them permission to be there.

A more thorough explanation:

An implied license by legal estoppel is a type of permission given to someone to use a property or intellectual property, even though the owner of the property has not expressly given permission. This type of license arises when the owner of the property has acted in a way that leads the other person to believe that they have permission to use the property. The license is implied because it is not explicitly stated, but rather inferred from the owner's actions.

For example, if a patent owner encourages someone to manufacture a product that infringes on their patent, they may be giving that person an implied license to use the patent. Another example is if a software company sells a product with a license agreement that allows the user to install the software on multiple computers, even though the license agreement does not explicitly state this. In both cases, the owner's actions have created an implied license by legal estoppel.

implied license by equitable estoppel | implied-license doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
UTA did that to me too
Not even a WL though
Yeah same
That happened to me a lot when applying in undergrad
Always feels like a money grab. Like they want you to have UTA in their mind rent free
anyway they can ride a long horn i didn't want them anyway *sobbing noises*
Literally. Like why would I transfer to a school where I was already at their medians
Above median gpa , at median lsat. Rejected and told to transfer? Out ur mind
oh umm, I was fs a charity case for UTA... bitter regardless
I’m bitter ngl
totally fair
Do not expect rejections from target schools
Getting waitlisted at safeties
Just annoying
Yeah wake forest hurt my feelings for sure LOL. Above both medians and the WL that said, also we have no money
waitlist from UC Hastings pissed me off
like sit down lmao
nah telling you to transfer is crazy
Even gave me the transfer application date
Like maybe if they waitlisted me or I was under their stats but to reject me and then say that in the same email is wild
MrThickRopes
20:29
Fo pm gon be goood 2mrw
21:13
tldr, law school is a meat market, and the legal job market is also a meat market, and just gettin in or applying for a job aint enough,
I got waitlisted at safety too youre not alone
two twos to my word croski, these ad coms all Herbert's
Gerberts****
@llama I find that article sort of contradictory. If every starts lateral-hiring there would quickly be a wide gap in available talent that needs correcting which would lead to surges in entry-level hiring, especially by the time we graduate
everyone*
23:21
@SailingSomewhere: 10 ppl move up a ladder rung/ 10 players lateraling musical chairs, sore there are more moves, but does that mean there are more realistic openings? Asking because I see your point but at the same time, moving jobs is part of the new culture, I think the avg person will have 4? careers, and statistically the best way to employee max is to move every 2-5 years. I am unsure as I have never worked as an attorney, nor do I have direct knowledge or connections that could confirm or deny besides for saying ymmv/ each takes a dif path.
what do you guys think ab brooklyn law school for sticker
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.