Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

impossible contract

Read a random definition: single-means claim

A quick definition of impossible contract:

An impossible contract is an agreement between two or more parties that cannot be fulfilled. A contract is a promise or set of promises that the law recognizes as a duty. It can be a series of actions or a written document that sets forth the agreement. However, the term "contract" should not be confused with the physical document itself. An impossible contract cannot be enforced because it is not possible to fulfill the obligations created by the agreement.

A more thorough explanation:

An impossible contract is a type of contract that cannot be fulfilled due to its terms or conditions. A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates legal obligations that can be enforced by law.

For example, if a contract requires a person to perform an act that is impossible to do, such as jumping over a building, it is considered an impossible contract. Another example is if a contract requires a person to do something that is illegal, such as selling drugs, it is also considered an impossible contract.

Impossible contracts are not enforceable by law because they are impossible to fulfill. Therefore, if a person enters into an impossible contract, they cannot be held liable for not fulfilling the terms of the contract.

Overall, an impossible contract is a contract that cannot be fulfilled due to its terms or conditions, and it is not enforceable by law.

impossible consideration | impost

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.