Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

imputed negligence

Read a random definition: DOL

A quick definition of imputed negligence:

Imputed negligence is when one person's negligence is charged to another person, usually because of a special relationship between them. For example, a parent might be responsible for some of their child's actions. Negligence is when someone fails to be careful enough and causes harm to someone else. It's like not paying attention and accidentally breaking something. Gross negligence is when someone is extremely careless and puts others in danger, like driving recklessly.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Imputed negligence is when the negligence of one person is charged to another person. It can happen when there is a special relationship between the two parties, such as a parent being responsible for the actions of their child. Negligence is the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation. It is any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm, except for conduct that is intentionally, wantonly, or willfully disregardful of others' rights.

Examples: A common example of imputed negligence is when a parent is held responsible for the actions of their child. For instance, if a child causes an accident while driving a car, the parent may be held liable for the damages. Another example is when an employer is held responsible for the negligence of their employee. For example, if an employee causes an accident while driving a company vehicle, the employer may be held liable for the damages.

Explanation: These examples illustrate imputed negligence because the negligence of one person (the child or the employee) is charged to another person (the parent or the employer) due to their special relationship. In both cases, the person charged with imputed negligence may not have been directly involved in the accident, but they are held responsible because of their relationship with the negligent party.

imputed knowledge | imputed notice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.