Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

standard of care

Read a random definition: ad feodi firmam

A quick definition of standard of care:

Standard of care: The standard of care is a rule that helps determine if someone was careless and responsible for causing harm to another person. It usually means acting like a reasonable person would in the same situation. For example, it's not reasonable to drive a car if you're taking medicine that makes you see things that aren't there. Different standards of care apply to different people, like doctors or kids, because they have different responsibilities and abilities.

A more thorough explanation:

Standard of care is a legal concept that determines whether a person was negligent and responsible for causing harm to another person. It is based on the idea of what a reasonable person would do in a given situation.

For example, if someone drives a car after taking medication that causes hallucinations, they would be breaching the standard of care. This is because a reasonable person would not drive under those circumstances. However, if the medication only causes hallucinations in 1 in 1,000 people, it may be harder to determine whether the person breached the standard of care.

The standard of care can vary depending on the situation. Children, for example, are held to a lower standard of care than adults because they may not have the same level of judgment and experience. Professionals, such as doctors and lawyers, are held to a higher standard of care because they have specialized knowledge and expertise.

Overall, the standard of care is an important concept in determining whether someone is liable for negligence and responsible for causing harm to another person.

standard mileage rate | Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.